PublishedISO 9001:2026 published 16 Sept 2026 · 2015 certificates must transition by 30 Sept 2029What changed →
Internal Auditor course (ISO 19011:2026):free until 31 Oct · then $59 for three monthsStart free now →
← Back to Clause Explorer
A.5.29ISO 27001:2022 Annex A

Information security during disruption

ISO/IEC 27002:2022 attributes

Control type
Preventive · Corrective
Security properties
Confidentiality · Integrity · Availability
Cybersecurity concept
Protect · Respond
Operational capability
Continuity
Security domain
Protection · Resilience

Attribute tags as published in ISO/IEC 27002:2022, compiled from public listings — confirm against your licensed copy.

Plain-language summary

Planning how information security is kept at an appropriate level when the business is disrupted — a power outage, flood, pandemic or cyber attack — so that continuity workarounds do not quietly switch off the controls that protect information.

What the clause is really asking

During a disruption people improvise: data goes onto personal laptops, shared passwords appear on whiteboards, a temporary supplier gets admin access. This control asks you to work out in advance how information security will be kept at the right level while the business is disrupted. In practice the business continuity and recovery plans include the security requirements: which controls must keep working in a crisis, which can be relaxed and on whose authority, what compensating controls apply when the normal ones are unavailable, and how you return to normal security afterwards. Where controls cannot be maintained, the risk should be assessed and accepted at the right level. The common misunderstanding is that business continuity is a separate system owned by someone else. The ISMS does not need to duplicate the continuity plan, but it must make sure that plan contains security. In South Africa, load-shedding and extended power outages are the familiar test: what happens to access control, CCTV, alarms and logging when the power goes, and to backups when the generator fails?

What auditors look for

Auditors ask for the business continuity or crisis plans and look for the security content: which controls stay on, who may authorise exceptions, how alternative sites and remote working are secured. They pick a past disruption — an outage, a system failure, a sudden move to remote work — and ask what happened to security during it. They check whether continuity exercises included a security scenario and whether exceptions granted in a crisis were reversed. The hard question: during your last major disruption, which controls were switched off, who decided, and when were they restored?

Typical evidence

Business continuity and disaster recovery plans with information security requirements; list of controls to maintain during disruption and their compensating controls; authority for emergency exceptions; risk assessments for disruption scenarios; exercise and test reports covering security; records of security exceptions during real disruptions and their reversal; power resilience arrangements for security systems.

How to comply — recommendations

Take your existing continuity plans and add a security section to each: controls that must keep running (identity, backups, logging, physical access), emergency workarounds that are allowed, who approves them, the compensating controls, and the check that removes them afterwards. Confirm that alternative sites and emergency remote access are at least as secure as normal operations, including multi-factor authentication. Check power resilience for security systems such as access control, alarms, CCTV and network equipment. Include one security scenario, such as ransomware during an outage, in the annual continuity exercise. After any real disruption, review what was relaxed and restore it.

Common nonconformities

Business continuity plans with no information security content; no defined authority for relaxing controls during a crisis; emergency access or workarounds never removed afterwards; alternative sites or remote access less secure than normal operations; security systems failing during power outages; continuity exercises never testing security; no risk assessment for disruption scenarios.

Related clauses

ISO/IEC 27002:2022 5.29 (guidance); ISO 27001 6.1, 8.1; Annex A 5.30 (ICT readiness), 5.26 (incident response), 8.13–8.14 (backup and redundancy), 7.11 (supporting utilities); NIST CSF 2.0 RC.RP (incident recovery plan execution), PR.IR (technology infrastructure resilience); ISO 22301 (business continuity).

Resources for this clause

Get the free ISO 27001 Annex A — 93 Controls Quick Reference (A3 PDF)

Free, instant download. We'll only email you the occasional practical quality update — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Qlause provides interpretive guidance only and is not a substitute for the standard. Refer to your licensed copy of the relevant standard for the authoritative text.

Certification & implementation

Working on a certification or system implementation project?

Implementing ISO 9001, moving to the 2026 edition, getting ready for a certification audit, or stuck on a clause that doesn't seem to fit your operation? Tell us where you are and where you're stuck. We'll look at it and suggest a practical next step, or connect you with people we trust who can help.

Email hello@qlause.app

No sales pitch, no obligation — we read every message.