PublishedISO 9001:2026 published 16 Sept 2026 · 2015 certificates must transition by 30 Sept 2029What changed →
Internal Auditor course (ISO 19011:2026):free until 31 Oct · then $59 for three monthsStart free now →
← Back to Clause Explorer
A.6.5ISO 27001:2022 Annex A

Responsibilities after termination or change of employment

ISO/IEC 27002:2022 attributes

Control type
Preventive
Security properties
Confidentiality · Integrity · Availability
Cybersecurity concept
Protect
Operational capability
Asset management · Human resource security
Security domain
Governance and ecosystem

Attribute tags as published in ISO/IEC 27002:2022, compiled from public listings — confirm against your licensed copy.

Plain-language summary

Making sure the security duties that outlive a job — confidentiality, intellectual property, care of personal information — are defined, communicated to the person leaving or moving, and enforced, and that internal moves do not leave old access and obligations behind.

What the clause is really asking

Leavers and movers are a reliable source of data loss: people take customer lists to competitors, and long-serving staff accumulate access from every role they have held. This control asks you to define which information security duties stay in force after someone leaves or changes role, build them into the terms (6.2), remind the person of them at the time of the change, and act when they are breached. It also covers your side: telling customers, suppliers and banks the person dealt with that they no longer act for you. A change of role is handled as closing one set of responsibilities and opening another. The common misunderstanding is treating this as the IT leaver checklist; disabling accounts and collecting laptops sit under access rights (5.18) and return of assets (5.11), while this control is about the duties that continue and how they are communicated. In South Africa, confidentiality obligations generally survive termination, while restraint-of-trade clauses are tested separately for reasonableness, so do not rely on a restraint alone to protect information.

What auditors look for

Auditors ask for the leaver and mover procedure and sample people who left or changed roles in the period. For leavers they look for the exit letter or acknowledgement reminding the person of continuing confidentiality and intellectual property duties, then trace account disablement and asset return dates against the last working day. For movers they compare current access with the new role and look for access left over from the old one. They ask whether customers, suppliers and the bank are told when a key contact leaves. The hard question: show me the sales manager who resigned to join a competitor, and what you did.

Typical evidence

Leaver and mover procedure; contract clauses on continuing obligations; exit letters or acknowledgements of continuing confidentiality and intellectual property duties; exit interview records; account disablement and asset return records against last working day; mover access reviews; notifications to customers, suppliers and banks when an authorised contact leaves; records of action on suspected breaches after departure.

How to comply — recommendations

Write a one-page leaver and mover procedure that HR triggers, not IT. For leavers: a standard exit letter listing the duties that continue (confidentiality, intellectual property, personal information, return of all company information including copies on personal devices), handed over and acknowledged at the exit interview; a same-day trigger to IT and the asset owner; and notice to customers, suppliers and the bank where the person was an authorised contact. For movers: a role-change form that closes the old access before granting the new. For high-risk departures, such as a resignation to join a competitor, review recent downloads and mail-forwarding rules before the last day.

Common nonconformities

No defined continuing responsibilities in contracts or exit documents; leavers never reminded of confidentiality duties; movers keep access from previous roles; HR does not notify IT promptly, so accounts stay active after departure; customers and banks not told when an authorised contact leaves; contractors at the end of an engagement not handled the same way as staff.

Related clauses

ISO/IEC 27002:2022 6.5 (guidance); ISO 27001 7.3; Annex A 5.11 (return of assets), 5.18 (access rights), 6.2, 6.6 (confidentiality agreements), 8.12 (data leakage prevention); POPIA s19, s20; NIST CSF 2.0 GV.RR (roles, responsibilities and authorities), PR.AA (identity management and access control).

Resources for this clause

Get the free ISO 27001 Annex A — 93 Controls Quick Reference (A3 PDF)

Free, instant download. We'll only email you the occasional practical quality update — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Qlause provides interpretive guidance only and is not a substitute for the standard. Refer to your licensed copy of the relevant standard for the authoritative text.

Certification & implementation

Working on a certification or system implementation project?

Implementing ISO 9001, moving to the 2026 edition, getting ready for a certification audit, or stuck on a clause that doesn't seem to fit your operation? Tell us where you are and where you're stuck. We'll look at it and suggest a practical next step, or connect you with people we trust who can help.

Email hello@qlause.app

No sales pitch, no obligation — we read every message.