PublishedISO 9001:2026 published 16 Sept 2026 · 2015 certificates must transition by 30 Sept 2029What changed →
Internal Auditor course (ISO 19011:2026):free until 31 Oct · then $59 for three monthsStart free now →
← Back to Clause Explorer
A.5.4ISO 27001:2022 Annex A

Management responsibilities

ISO/IEC 27002:2022 attributes

Control type
Preventive
Security properties
Confidentiality · Integrity · Availability
Cybersecurity concept
Identify
Operational capability
Governance
Security domain
Governance and ecosystem

Attribute tags as published in ISO/IEC 27002:2022, compiled from public listings — confirm against your licensed copy.

Plain-language summary

Making every manager, not only top management, answerable for the people who report to them applying the information security policies and procedures in their daily work — and for supporting them with time, training, a clear route to report concerns and a good example.

What the clause is really asking

Clause 5.1 of ISO 27001 deals with top management's leadership of the ISMS. This control reaches further down the line: it makes managers answerable for their people following the security policies and procedures in practice. That means line managers making sure their team members are briefed on their security responsibilities before they get access, understand the policies that apply to their role, have the time and training to comply, follow the rules, and know how to report a concern or incident without fear of blame. Managers also set the example — a manager who shares passwords or forwards confidential files to personal email teaches the team that the policy is optional. The common misunderstanding is to treat this as a repeat of clause 5.1 and answer it with the CEO's signature on the policy. Auditors look for evidence at supervisor level. In South Africa this is the people side of the 'organisational measures' POPIA section 19 requires, and ISO 9001 practitioners will recognise the pattern of leadership exercised at every level, not only at the top.

What auditors look for

Auditors interview managers at several levels — a production supervisor, a finance manager, a sales lead — and ask what they do to make sure their team follows the security policies. They ask how a new starter is briefed before getting system access and who signs that off. They check whether security responsibilities appear in managers' own objectives or performance reviews. They look at how a manager dealt with a policy breach in their team and whether it went through the disciplinary process. They test the reporting route by asking staff whether they would report a mistake. The hard question: show me a manager acting on a security issue in their own area.

Typical evidence

Manager briefing or training records on security responsibilities; induction checklists signed by the line manager before access is granted; security objectives or KPIs in management performance reviews; team meeting or toolbox talk records covering security; records of managers handling breaches and reporting incidents; confidential concern-reporting channel; management communications reinforcing policy.

How to comply — recommendations

Write a short manager's guide to information security: what managers must do for starters, movers and leavers, how to brief their team, how to handle a breach and how to escalate. Add a line-manager sign-off to the induction checklist confirming the security briefing happened before access was granted. Include one security item in each manager's annual objectives — team completion of awareness training, timely access reviews, prompt leaver notifications. Put information security on team meeting or toolbox talk agendas a few times a year and keep the attendance record. Make sure the confidential concern-reporting channel is known and that managers respond to reports without blame.

Common nonconformities

Managers unaware of their security responsibilities; staff given access before any security briefing; no security expectations in management objectives; managers bypassing policy themselves, for example by sharing credentials; team breaches handled informally with no record or follow-up; staff unaware how to raise a security concern; evidence of management commitment limited to the CEO's signature on the policy.

Related clauses

ISO/IEC 27002:2022 5.4 (guidance); ISO 27001 5.1 (leadership and commitment), 7.3 (awareness); Annex A 5.1 (policies), 5.2 (roles and responsibilities), 6.3 (awareness, education and training), 6.4 (disciplinary process), 6.8 (event reporting); POPIA s19; NIST CSF 2.0 GV.RR (roles, responsibilities and authorities); ISO 9001 5.1.

Resources for this clause

Get the free ISO 27001 Annex A — 93 Controls Quick Reference (A3 PDF)

Free, instant download. We'll only email you the occasional practical quality update — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Qlause provides interpretive guidance only and is not a substitute for the standard. Refer to your licensed copy of the relevant standard for the authoritative text.

Certification & implementation

Working on a certification or system implementation project?

Implementing ISO 9001, moving to the 2026 edition, getting ready for a certification audit, or stuck on a clause that doesn't seem to fit your operation? Tell us where you are and where you're stuck. We'll look at it and suggest a practical next step, or connect you with people we trust who can help.

Email hello@qlause.app

No sales pitch, no obligation — we read every message.