PublishedISO 9001:2026 published 16 Sept 2026 · 2015 certificates must transition by 30 Sept 2029What changed →
Internal Auditor course (ISO 19011:2026):free until 31 Oct · then $59 for three monthsStart free now →
← Back to Clause Explorer
2.5.15FSSC 22000:V7

Equipment management — hygienic design and change control

Plain-language summary

A purchase specification that covers hygienic design before equipment is bought, and risk-based change management with commissioning evidence for new or changed equipment.

What the clause is really asking

Equipment brought in without a food-safety view is a hazard bolted to the floor. For every category except brokers and traders you need a documented purchase specification addressing hygienic design, applicable legal and customer requirements, and the equipment's intended use including the product it will handle — and the supplier must show it meets that specification before installation. New equipment and changes to existing equipment must go through a risk-based change management process, adequately documented, with evidence of successful commissioning, an assessment of effects on existing systems, and control measures determined and implemented.

What auditors look for

Auditors pick the newest piece of equipment on site and ask for its purchase specification, the supplier's evidence against it, the change assessment and the commissioning record. A machine that arrived and started running the same week is a finding waiting to happen.

Typical evidence

Equipment purchase specification template and completed specifications; supplier evidence of conformance prior to installation; change management records with risk assessment; commissioning evidence; updated PRPs, cleaning validations and hazard analysis after the change

How to comply — recommendations

Put hygienic design and cleanability into the purchase specification before the order is placed, and make supplier evidence a condition of delivery. Run equipment changes through the same change form as product changes, with commissioning and cleaning validation as sign-off steps.

Common nonconformities

No purchase specification, or one written after delivery; supplier evidence never requested; equipment changes undocumented; commissioning not recorded; cleaning validation and hazard analysis not updated after a change

Related clauses

ISO 22000 7.1.3 (infrastructure), 8.2.4 (PRPs), 6.3 (planning of changes); ISO 22002-1:2025 (equipment suitability); FSSC 22000 2.5.13

Resources for this clause

Get the free FSSC 22000 V7 Gap Checklist

Free, instant download. We'll only email you the occasional practical quality update — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Qlause provides interpretive guidance only and is not a substitute for the standard. Refer to your licensed copy of the relevant standard for the authoritative text.

Certification & implementation

Working on a certification or system implementation project?

Implementing ISO 9001, moving to the 2026 edition, getting ready for a certification audit, or stuck on a clause that doesn't seem to fit your operation? Tell us where you are and where you're stuck. We'll look at it and suggest a practical next step, or connect you with people we trust who can help.

Email hello@qlause.app

No sales pitch, no obligation — we read every message.