PublishedISO 9001:2026 published 16 Sept 2026 · 2015 certificates must transition by 30 Sept 2029What changed →
Internal Auditor course (ISO 19011:2026):free until 31 Oct · then $59 for three monthsStart free now →
← Back to Clause Explorer
9.3.1.1/9.3.2.1/9.3.3.1IATF 16949:2016

Management review — supplementals (IATF only)

Plain-language summary

At least annually (more often when risk demands), with automotive-specific inputs — cost of poor quality, process effectiveness AND efficiency, warranty, field failures, customer scorecards, feasibility results — and a documented action plan when customer performance targets are missed.

What the clause is really asking

Frequency: at least annual, increased by risk to compliance from internal/external changes or performance issues. Added inputs include: cost of poor quality, measures of process effectiveness and efficiency, product conformance, feasibility assessments for changes/new facilities/products, customer satisfaction, performance against maintenance objectives, warranty performance where applicable, customer scorecard reviews, field failure identification, capability results. Added output: documented and implemented action plan when customer performance requirements are not met.

What auditors look for

Auditors check the automotive inputs are genuinely on the table (CoPQ and warranty being the classic absentees), the annual minimum is met, and — the sharp edge — where the customer scorecard shows a missed target, a documented action plan exists and is being executed.

Typical evidence

Review packs showing the IATF inputs; CoPQ reporting; scorecard reviews in minutes; action plans for missed customer targets with implementation evidence.

How to comply — recommendations

Extend your review agenda with the IATF input list as a second column. Standing rule: any red on any customer scorecard automatically generates an action-plan agenda item — auditors check that link first.

Common nonconformities

CoPQ never quantified; warranty/field data absent; customer target missed with no documented action plan; reviews skipping the annual minimum after a quiet year.

Related clauses

Builds on ISO 9001 9.3

In the book

Chapter 9 — Evaluation — Reading Your Own Instruments treats this clause family in full: what it is really asking, what auditors look for, the evidence that satisfies, how to make it work on a real floor, and where companies stumble. This IATF requirement is covered in the Automotive Edition, in the same six blocks as the ISO clause around it.

The Clause Companion →Read a free sampleAutomotive Edition · $12.99

Get the free ISO 9001:2026 Readiness Scorecard

Free, instant download. We'll only email you the occasional practical quality update — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Qlause provides interpretive guidance only and is not a substitute for the standard. Refer to your licensed copy of the relevant standard for the authoritative text.

Certification & implementation

Working on a certification or system implementation project?

Implementing ISO 9001, moving to the 2026 edition, getting ready for a certification audit, or stuck on a clause that doesn't seem to fit your operation? Tell us where you are and where you're stuck. We'll look at it and suggest a practical next step, or connect you with people we trust who can help.

Email hello@qlause.app

No sales pitch, no obligation — we read every message.